[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160903155937.GI31705@egarver>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 11:59:37 -0400
From: Eric Garver <e@...g.me>
To: pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
Thomas F Herbert <thomasfherbert@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v21 4/4] openvswitch: report error on
VLAN nlattr in ovs_key_from_nlattrs()
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:42:41PM -0700, pravin shelar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Eric Garver <e@...g.me> wrote:
> > With 802.1ad support these are parsed and set upfront by
> > parse_vlan_from_nlattrs() before ovs_key_from_nlattrs() is ever called.
> > As such we should never see a VLAN attribute in ovs_key_from_nlattrs().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Garver <e@...g.me>
> > ---
> > net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 19 +++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
> > index fbe9e0e4792d..0f36aead744b 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
> > @@ -923,20 +923,11 @@ static int ovs_key_from_nlattrs(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_match *match,
> > }
> >
> > if (attrs & (1 << OVS_KEY_ATTR_VLAN)) {
> > - __be16 tci;
> > -
> > - tci = nla_get_be16(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_VLAN]);
> > - if (!(tci & htons(VLAN_TAG_PRESENT))) {
> > - if (is_mask)
> > - OVS_NLERR(log, "VLAN TCI mask does not have exact match for VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit.");
> > - else
> > - OVS_NLERR(log, "VLAN TCI does not have VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit set.");
> > -
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > - SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT(match, eth.vlan.tci, tci, is_mask);
> > - attrs &= ~(1 << OVS_KEY_ATTR_VLAN);
> > + /* VLAN attribute is always parsed before getting here since it may
> > + * occur multiple times.
> > + */
> > + OVS_NLERR(log, "VLAN attribute unexpected.");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> Is there reason for not merging this patch with earlier patch?
Not a particularly good one. I'll merge it into patch 3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists