netdev - [PATCH net-next 1/9] rxrpc: fix undefined behavior in rxrpc_mark_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <147302295141.28597.17761498339552126149.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 04 Sep 2016 22:02:31 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/9] rxrpc: fix undefined behavior in
 rxrpc_mark_call_released

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

gcc -Wmaybe-initialized correctly points out a newly introduced bug
through which we can end up calling rxrpc_queue_call() for a dead
connection:

net/rxrpc/call_object.c: In function 'rxrpc_mark_call_released':
net/rxrpc/call_object.c:600:5: error: 'sched' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

This sets the 'sched' variable to zero to restore the previous
behavior.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: f5c17aaeb2ae ("rxrpc: Calls should only have one terminal state")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/call_object.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
index 516d8ea82f02..57e00fc9cff2 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static void rxrpc_dead_call_expired(unsigned long _call)
  */
 static void rxrpc_mark_call_released(struct rxrpc_call *call)
 {
-	bool sched;
+	bool sched = false;
 
 	rxrpc_see_call(call);
 	write_lock(&call->state_lock);