[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160906213128.GG33916@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:31:28 -0400
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>
Cc: Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: check MTU against minimum threshold
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Bert Kenward wrote:
> Reported-by: Ma Yuying <yuma@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>
Works for me, until we can get some dialog going about possible
centralization (or not) of MTU checking, so we don't have this slightly
crazy proliferation of *_MIN_MTU anymore. :)
Reviewed-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists