[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b288d0c-507f-d487-aa76-0778fd442f35@mojatatu.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:52:24 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 2/6] net_sched: introduce tcf_hash_replace()
On 16-09-02 01:57 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> ---
> include/net/act_api.h | 2 ++
> net/sched/act_api.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
> index 82f3c91..a374bab 100644
> --- a/include/net/act_api.h
>
> +void tcf_hash_replace(struct tc_action_net *tn, struct tc_action **old,
> + struct tc_action *new, int bind)
> +{
> + struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo = tn->hinfo;
> + unsigned int h = tcf_hash(new->tcfa_index, hinfo->hmask);
> +
WWhy do you need to recreate the index?
Old index was fine since this is just a replacement..
The rest of the patches seem fine - will let Eric comment on the
mirred.
Note: I am going to still push forward with skbmod action and I think
so should the new tunnel action code i.e we make them independent.
I'd like to switch to this when we think it is stable.
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists