[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160907152046.wxzy3ivsi7n4y52b@alphalink.fr>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:20:46 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Milan Kocian <milon@...cz>,
Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv4: fix value of ->nlmsg_flags reported in
RTM_NEWROUTE events
fib_table_insert() inconsistently fills the nlmsg_flags field in its
notification messages.
Since commit b8f558313506 ("[RTNETLINK]: Fix sending netlink message
when replace route."), the netlink message has its nlmsg_flags set to
NLM_F_REPLACE if the route replaced a preexisting one.
Then commit a2bb6d7d6f42 ("ipv4: include NLM_F_APPEND flag in append
route notifications") started setting nlmsg_flags to NLM_F_APPEND if
the route matched a preexisting one but was appended.
In other cases (exclusive creation or prepend), nlmsg_flags is 0.
This patch sets ->nlmsg_flags in all situations, preserving the
semantic of the NLM_F_* bits:
* NLM_F_CREATE: a new fib entry has been created for this route.
* NLM_F_EXCL: no other fib entry existed for this route.
* NLM_F_REPLACE: this route has overwritten a preexisting fib entry.
* NLM_F_APPEND: the new fib entry was added after other entries for
the same route.
As a result, the possible flag combination can now be reported
(iproute2's terminology into parentheses):
* NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_EXCL: route didn't exist, exclusive creation
("add").
* NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_APPEND: route did already exist, new route
added after preexisting ones ("append").
* NLM_F_CREATE: route did already exist, new route added before
preexisting ones ("prepend").
* NLM_F_REPLACE: route did already exist, new route replaced the
first preexisting one ("change").
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index e2ffc2a..241f27b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
struct trie *t = (struct trie *)tb->tb_data;
struct fib_alias *fa, *new_fa;
struct key_vector *l, *tp;
- unsigned int nlflags = 0;
+ u16 nlflags = NLM_F_EXCL;
struct fib_info *fi;
u8 plen = cfg->fc_dst_len;
u8 slen = KEYLENGTH - plen;
@@ -1126,6 +1126,8 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
if (cfg->fc_nlflags & NLM_F_EXCL)
goto out;
+ nlflags &= ~NLM_F_EXCL;
+
/* We have 2 goals:
* 1. Find exact match for type, scope, fib_info to avoid
* duplicate routes
@@ -1151,6 +1153,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
struct fib_info *fi_drop;
u8 state;
+ nlflags |= NLM_F_REPLACE;
fa = fa_first;
if (fa_match) {
if (fa == fa_match)
@@ -1191,7 +1194,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
if (state & FA_S_ACCESSED)
rt_cache_flush(cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net);
rtmsg_fib(RTM_NEWROUTE, htonl(key), new_fa, plen,
- tb->tb_id, &cfg->fc_nlinfo, NLM_F_REPLACE);
+ tb->tb_id, &cfg->fc_nlinfo, nlflags);
goto succeeded;
}
@@ -1203,7 +1206,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
goto out;
if (cfg->fc_nlflags & NLM_F_APPEND)
- nlflags = NLM_F_APPEND;
+ nlflags |= NLM_F_APPEND;
else
fa = fa_first;
}
@@ -1211,6 +1214,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
if (!(cfg->fc_nlflags & NLM_F_CREATE))
goto out;
+ nlflags |= NLM_F_CREATE;
err = -ENOBUFS;
new_fa = kmem_cache_alloc(fn_alias_kmem, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_fa)
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists