[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUDqM4s4+VYpyPXhrFE4vTuEQorj2_nJrtM75y548hDHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:27:58 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirva@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 4/4] net/sched: Introduce act_tunnel_key
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:08 +0300, Hadar Hen Zion wrote:
>> From: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
>>
>
>
>> +static int tunnel_key_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> + struct nlattr *est, struct tc_action **a,
>> + int ovr, int bind)
>> +{
>> + struct tc_action_net *tn = net_generic(net, tunnel_key_net_id);
>> + struct nlattr *tb[TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_MAX + 1];
>> + struct metadata_dst *metadata = NULL;
>> + struct tc_tunnel_key *parm;
>> + struct tcf_tunnel_key *t;
>> + struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params_old;
>> + struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params_new;
>> + __be64 key_id;
>> + bool exists = false;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + int err;
>
> We try for new code to avoid reverse Christmas tree ;)
Fix checkpatch.pl (or whatever tool you prefer).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists