[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160907204818.GA7470@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:48:18 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com" <xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com>,
"Shabeena Shabeena -X (sshabeen - ARICENT TECHNOLOGIES MAURIITIUS
LIMITED at Cisco)" <sshabeen@...co.com>
Subject: Re: ptp
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:40:59PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> There is a test (below) , which prevents negative nanosecond updates. The
> code below would force a negative update to always return more than
> NSEC_PER_SEC. It should be using abs() instead which would return the value
> desired.
No. This:
/*
* The value of a timeval is the sum of its fields, but the
* field tv_usec must always be non-negative.
*/
HTH,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists