[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908102115.GA22483@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:21:15 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the net-next
tree
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:51:12PM +0000, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> It isn't so much about the Pull Request, more about having a single pre-merged
> location and making sure that everyone is on the same page for testing.
I don't understand. If you want to have a git tree, for testing in
linux-next, that's fine, but I still need/want patches in email to take
things to be merged "properly" on through to Linus for the sections of
the hv code that go through me.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists