[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908141626.0ae9025a@xeon-e3>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:16:26 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: "D. Herrendoerfer" <d.herrendoerfer@...rendoerfer.name>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] bridge: MAC learning uevents
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:30:08 -0700
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 10:19 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote:
> >
> > On 08 Sep 2016, at 17:39, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:06:16 +0200
> >> "D. Herrendoerfer" <d.herrendoerfer@...rendoerfer.name> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to start a discussion if it makes sense to add an optional feature
> >>>
> >>> to the bridge MAC address learning code to generate kernel uevents for
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> >>>
> >>> I'm porting my patch (for 3.10.0) to head, and will make it available, I
> >>> just want some
> >>>
> >>> valuable feedback as early as possible.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, D.Herrendoerfer
> >>
> >> This should be possible by listening for netlink events.
> >> No need for udev interaction.
> >
> > No, there are none, not for changes to the bridge forwarding table, also this would
> > require a tool to continuously listen for changes.
>
> Wat do you expect uevent to solve here that netlink + a monitoring
> program can't?
>
> There is quite a bit of code in net/bridge/br_fdb.c just to deal with
> notifying learned/added MAC addresses, is not that where you should
> start adding what you are after (if that is not supported as of latest
> mainline)?
just like neighbor table modifications, it should be possible to listen for
events with netlink. Doing it through uevent is the wrong model.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists