lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 03:00:57 +0000 From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/3] r8152: configuration setting David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 8:38 AM [...] > By forcing a certain mode via a Kconfig value, you are basically making it > impossible for distributions to do something reasonable here. The request is always from some manufacturers, not end users. They always ask the driver to control everything. And I don't think the end user knows or cares about how the device is set. That is why I try to satisfy them via Kconfig. I think you have rejected this way. I would think if there is any other method. Thanks. Best Regards, Hayes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists