netdev - Re: [PATCH 12/15] sis900: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B33AC648-AF69-4FA1-8E46-465DCEE29C3D@brownhat.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:10:10 +0200
From:   Daniele Venzano <venza@...wnhat.org>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] sis900: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module



On 12 September 2016 16:03:43 CEST, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> wrote:
>The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled
>either
>built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the
>same.
>
>Using the macro makes the code more readable by helping abstract away
>some
>of the Kconfig built-in and module enable details.
>
>Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

Acked-by: Daniele Venzano <venza@...wnhat.org>