[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b773a674-cbb6-4b87-8a78-95648ab848ea@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:51:03 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/1] net sched actions: fix GETing actions
On 16-09-12 01:18 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>> + if (ovr)
>> + a->tcfa_refcnt-=1;
>
> How about tcfa_bindcnt?
We dont touch it when mucking around only with actions (as is in
this case).
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> struct nlattr *est, char *name, int ovr,
>> int bind, struct list_head *actions)
>> @@ -612,8 +622,15 @@ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> goto err;
>> }
>> act->order = i;
>> + if (ovr)
>
> Need to check this boolean? It looks like we need this for !ovr case too?
>
They are fine if they didnt exist.
I will fix the coding style issues and submit.
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists