netdev - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] proc connector: add namespace events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:39:44 +0300
From:   Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:     Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
        Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Iago Lopez Galeiras <iago@...volk.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] proc connector: add namespace events

Hi everyone

08.09.2016, 18:39, "Alban Crequy" <alban.crequy@...il.com>:
> The act of a process creating or joining a namespace via clone(),
> unshare() or setns() is a useful signal for monitoring applications.

> + if (old_ns->mnt_ns != new_ns->mnt_ns)
> + proc_ns_connector(tsk, CLONE_NEWNS, PROC_NM_REASON_CLONE, old_mntns_inum, new_mntns_inum);
> +
> + if (old_ns->uts_ns != new_ns->uts_ns)
> + proc_ns_connector(tsk, CLONE_NEWUTS, PROC_NM_REASON_CLONE, old_ns->uts_ns->ns.inum, new_ns->uts_ns->ns.inum);
> +
> + if (old_ns->ipc_ns != new_ns->ipc_ns)
> + proc_ns_connector(tsk, CLONE_NEWIPC, PROC_NM_REASON_CLONE, old_ns->ipc_ns->ns.inum, new_ns->ipc_ns->ns.inum);
> +
> + if (old_ns->net_ns != new_ns->net_ns)
> + proc_ns_connector(tsk, CLONE_NEWNET, PROC_NM_REASON_CLONE, old_ns->net_ns->ns.inum, new_ns->net_ns->ns.inum);
> +
> + if (old_ns->cgroup_ns != new_ns->cgroup_ns)
> + proc_ns_connector(tsk, CLONE_NEWCGROUP, PROC_NM_REASON_CLONE, old_ns->cgroup_ns->ns.inum, new_ns->cgroup_ns->ns.inum);
> +
> + if (old_ns->pid_ns_for_children != new_ns->pid_ns_for_children)
> + proc_ns_connector(tsk, CLONE_NEWPID, PROC_NM_REASON_CLONE, old_ns->pid_ns_for_children->ns.inum, new_ns->pid_ns_for_children->ns.inum);
> + }
> +

Patch looks good to me from technical/connector point of view, but these even multiplication is a bit weird imho.

I'm not against it, but did you consider sending just 2 serialized ns structures via single message, and client
would check all ns bits himself?