[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473722404.18970.97.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:20:04 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/1] net_sched: Introduce skbmod action
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 16:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> diff --git a/net/core/gen_stats.c b/net/core/gen_stats.c
> index 508e051304fb62627e61b5065b2325edd1b84f2e..dc9dd8ae7d5405f76c775278dac7689655b21041 100644
> --- a/net/core/gen_stats.c
> +++ b/net/core/gen_stats.c
> @@ -142,10 +142,14 @@ __gnet_stats_copy_basic(const seqcount_t *running,
> return;
> }
> do {
> - if (running)
> + if (running) {
> + local_bh_disable();
> seq = read_seqcount_begin(running);
> + }
> bstats->bytes = b->bytes;
> bstats->packets = b->packets;
> + if (running)
> + local_bh_enable();
> } while (running && read_seqcount_retry(running, seq));
> }
Ah well, forget this patch, re-enabling bh right before
read_seqcount_retry() is not going to help.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists