[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99274ae5-4f40-fc08-3d35-9b2fe7f792b5@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:56:31 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/1] net_sched: Introduce skbmod action
On 16-09-12 07:40 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 19:30 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
>> +
>> +static struct tc_action_ops act_skbmod_ops = {
>> + .kind = "skbmod",
>> + .type = TCA_ACT_SKBMOD,
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .act = tcf_skbmod_run,
>> + .dump = tcf_skbmod_dump,
>> + .init = tcf_skbmod_init,
>> + .walk = tcf_skbmod_walker,
>> + .lookup = tcf_skbmod_search,
>> + .size = sizeof(struct tcf_skbmod),
>> +};
>
> Looks like you missed a .cleanup() handler ?
>
> Otherwise, d->skbmod_p wont be freed .
>
>
>
Yes, I did ;->
Another version coming. Is there a good way to catch
something like this (ala userspace valgrind)?
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists