[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36ECC79A-0810-4D06-A72D-702AD9901E83@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:28:03 +0000
From: "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"William Tu" <u9012063@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH v3 2/3] e1000: add initial
XDP support
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> I've looked through qemu and it appears only emulate e1k and tg3.
> The latter is still used in the field, so the risk of touching
> it is higher.
I have no idea what makes you think that e1k is *not* "used in the field".
I grant you it probably is used more virtualized than not these days, but
it certainly exists and is used. You can still buy them new at Newegg for
goodness sakes!
Maybe I'll go home and plug in my old e100 into my machine that still has a
PCI slot, just for old times sake. Oh darn, I have a SCSI card in that
slot...
--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists