netdev - Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d4cde14a-8147-6097-f034-c9cde6cdb718@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:03:18 +0300
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period

On 09/14/2016 05:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> @@ -427,9 +427,6 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts)
>>  	u64 ns;
>>  	u64 frac;
>>  
>> -	if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
>> -		return;
>> -
>>  	freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk);
>>  
>>  	/* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before
> 
> This hunk has nothing to do with $subject.

Sry, but I did not get your comment here :(
I'd happy to update patch according to your request, but could you provide more info here, pls?



> 
>> @@ -442,11 +439,20 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts)
>>  	else if (maxsec > 600 && cpts->cc.mask > UINT_MAX)
>>  		maxsec = 600;
>>  
>> +	/* Calc overflow check period (maxsec / 2) */
>> +	cpts->ov_check_period = (HZ * maxsec) / 2;
>> +	dev_info(cpts->dev, "cpts: overflow check period %lu\n",
>> +		 cpts->ov_check_period);
>> +
>> +	if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	clocks_calc_mult_shift(&mult, &shift, freq, NSEC_PER_SEC, maxsec);
>>  
>>  	cpts->cc_mult = mult;
>>  	cpts->cc.mult = mult;
>>  	cpts->cc.shift = shift;
>> +
> 
> Nor does this.



-- 
regards,
-grygorii