netdev - Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160914200845.GB12195@netboy>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:08:45 +0200
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:03:18PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 05:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> @@ -427,9 +427,6 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts)
> >>  	u64 ns;
> >>  	u64 frac;
> >>  
> >> -	if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
> >> -		return;
> >> -
> >>  	freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk);
> >>  
> >>  	/* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before
> > 
> > This hunk has nothing to do with $subject.
> 
> Sry, but I did not get your comment here :(
> I'd happy to update patch according to your request, but could you provide more info here, pls?

You added that code in patch #7.  Then you moved it in patch #8.  You
could have made the code correct in patch #7 to begin with.

> >>  	cpts->cc_mult = mult;
> >>  	cpts->cc.mult = mult;
> >>  	cpts->cc.shift = shift;
> >> +

If you want a blank line here, then put into the original patch #7.

Thanks,
Richard