| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160914211608.GB57174@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:16:10 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 14/22] bpf/cgroup: Make cgroup_bpf_update() return an
error code
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:24:07AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> This will be useful to support Landlock for the next commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
I think this is good to do regardless. Sooner or later cgroup_bpf_update
will start rejecting the prog attach. Like we discussed to have a flag
that would dissallow processeses lower in the cgroup hierarchy to install
their own bpf programs.
It will be minimal change to bpf_prog_attach() error handling,
but will greatly help Mickael to build stuff on top.
DanielM can you refactor your patch to do that from the start ?
Thanks!
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 3 ++-
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 10 ++++++----
> kernel/cgroup.c | 6 ++++--
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index 2234042d7f61..6cca7924ee17 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ struct cgroup_bpf {
> void cgroup_bpf_put(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> void cgroup_bpf_inherit(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *parent);
>
> -void __cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> +int __cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> struct cgroup *parent,
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
> enum bpf_attach_type type);
>
> /* Wrapper for __cgroup_bpf_update() protected by cgroup_mutex */
> -void cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> +int cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
> enum bpf_attach_type type);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index 782878ec4f2d..7b75fa692617 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void cgroup_bpf_inherit(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *parent)
> *
> * Must be called with cgroup_mutex held.
> */
> -void __cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> +int __cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> struct cgroup *parent,
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
> enum bpf_attach_type type)
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ void __cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> bpf_prog_put(old_pinned.prog);
> static_branch_dec(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
> }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 45a91d511119..c978f2d9a1b3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -831,6 +831,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> {
> struct bpf_prog *prog;
> struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + int result;
>
> if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
> @@ -858,10 +859,10 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> return PTR_ERR(cgrp);
> }
>
> - cgroup_bpf_update(cgrp, prog, attr->attach_type);
> + result = cgroup_bpf_update(cgrp, prog, attr->attach_type);
> cgroup_put(cgrp);
>
> - return 0;
> + return result;
> }
>
> #define BPF_PROG_DETACH_LAST_FIELD attach_type
> @@ -869,6 +870,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> {
> struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + int result = 0;
>
> if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
> @@ -883,7 +885,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> if (IS_ERR(cgrp))
> return PTR_ERR(cgrp);
>
> - cgroup_bpf_update(cgrp, NULL, attr->attach_type);
> + result = cgroup_bpf_update(cgrp, NULL, attr->attach_type);
> cgroup_put(cgrp);
> break;
>
> @@ -891,7 +893,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return result;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF */
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 87324ce481b1..48b650a640a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -6450,15 +6450,17 @@ static __init int cgroup_namespaces_init(void)
> subsys_initcall(cgroup_namespaces_init);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
> -void cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> +int cgroup_bpf_update(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
> enum bpf_attach_type type)
> {
> struct cgroup *parent = cgroup_parent(cgrp);
> + int result;
>
> mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> - __cgroup_bpf_update(cgrp, parent, prog, type);
> + result = __cgroup_bpf_update(cgrp, parent, prog, type);
> mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> + return result;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF */
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists