lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:22:39 +0800
From:   Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@...iatek.com>
To:     <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <john@...ozen.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <nbd@...nwrt.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <nelsonch.tw@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: add ethtool
 functions to configure RX flows of HW LRO

(resend)

Thanks Florian for the review!
I will add ndo_fix_features hook in v2 to prevent the case that a user
wants to turn off NETIF_F_LRO but RX flow is programmed.
If any programmed RX flow exists, NETIF_F_LRO cannot be turned off.

-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.fainelli@...il.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:27 AM
To: Nelson Chang (張家祥); john@...ozen.org; davem@...emloft.net
Cc: nbd@...nwrt.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org; nelsonch.tw@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: add ethtool
functions to configure RX flows of HW LRO

On 09/13/2016 06:54 AM, Nelson Chang wrote:
> The codes add ethtool functions to set RX flows for HW LRO. Because 
> the HW LRO hardware can only recognize the destination IP of TCP/IP
RX 
> flows, the ethtool command to add HW LRO flow is as below:
> ethtool -N [devname] flow-type tcp4 dst-ip [ip_addr] loc [0~1]
> 
> Otherwise, cause the hardware can set total four destination IPs,
each 
> GMAC (GMAC1/GMAC2) can set two IPs separately at most.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@...iatek.com>
> ---

> +
> +static int mtk_set_features(struct net_device *dev, netdev_features_t
> +features) {
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (!((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!(features & NETIF_F_LRO))
> +		mtk_hwlro_netdev_disable(dev);

you may want to implement a fix_features ndo operations which makes sure
that NETIF_F_LRO is turned on in case a RX flow is programmed,
otherwise, it may be confusing to the user that a flow was programmed,
but no offload is happening.
--
Florian


Powered by blists - more mailing lists