netdev - Re: [RFC 00/11] QLogic RDMA Driver (qedr) RFC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fbb0eb54-da12-5766-9a79-acc0d088aca0@grimberg.me>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:17:27 +0300
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     "Elior, Ariel" <Ariel.Elior@...ium.com>,
        Ram Amrani <Ram.Amrani@...gic.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com" <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>,
        "Ariel.Elior@...gic.com" <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
        "Michal.Kalderon@...gic.com" <Michal.Kalderon@...gic.com>,
        "rajesh.borundia@...gic.com" <rajesh.borundia@...gic.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] QLogic RDMA Driver (qedr) RFC

>> > SRQ is not part of the RFC (but we do have it and NVMF was tested
> with it).
>
>>
>
>> Nice, I have plans to make SRQs better usable for our ULPs so it'd be
>
>> good to have it.
>
> That’s good to know. Are there plans on implementing XRC?
>
> Right now it looks like none of the ULPS make use of it.

The problem with XRC is that it needs to be reflected on the
wire protocol for it to actually be useful for our ULPs. Not
sure if its worth the effort...