netdev - Re: [RFC 02/11] Add RoCE driver framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160915054235.GK26069@leon.nu>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:42:35 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Cc:     "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
        Ram Amrani <Ram.Amrani@...gic.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
        Michal Kalderon <Michal.Kalderon@...gic.com>,
        Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@...gic.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/11] Add RoCE driver framework

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:11:03AM +0000, Mintz, Yuval wrote:
> > As a summary, I didn't see in your responses any real life example where you will
> > need global debug level for your driver.
>
> Not sure what you you're expecting - a list of BZs /private e-mails where
> user reproductions were needed?
> You're basically ignoring my claims that such are used, instead wanting
> "evidence". I'm not going to try and produce any such.

I asked an example and not evidence, where "modprobe your_driver
debug=1" will be superior to "modprobe your_driver dyndbg==pmf".

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)