[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160915081341.GA25737@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:13:41 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: rework
initialization/deinitialization
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:25PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> The current implementation CPTS initialization and deinitialization
> (represented by cpts_register/unregister()) is pretty entangled and
> has some issues, like:
> - ptp clock registered before spinlock, which is protecting it, and
> before timecounter and cyclecounter initialization;
> - CPTS ref_clk requested using devm API while cpts_register() is
> called from .ndo_open(), as result additional checks required;
> - CPTS ref_clk is prepared, but never unprepared;
> - CPTS is not disabled even when unregistered..
This list of four items is a clear sign that this one patch should be
broken into a series of four.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists