[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9C6B67F36DCAFC479B1CF6A967258A8C7DE16CC2@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 16:43:04 +0000
From: "Woodruff, Robert J" <robert.j.woodruff@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
pv-drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jorgen S. Hansen" <jhansen@...are.com>,
Aditya Sarwade <asarwade@...are.com>,
George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 00/16] Add Paravirtual RDMA Driver
Jason wrote,
>I should be clearer here. I am *strongly* opposed to anything that changes the license of the existing 4 core libraries away from the
>GPLv2 or OpenIB.org situation we have today. (that includes to other varients of the BSD license)
>I just checked and we appear to be completely OK on this point today.
Ok, thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists