[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160916171827.GE5204@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:18:27 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
coreteam@...filter.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] [lkp] [netfilter] 68263ddb47: WARNING: CPU: 0
PID: 1225 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:232
nf_ct_seq_offset+0x7a/0x9a
Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com> wrote:
> > [ 23.465616] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 23.466477] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1225 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:232
> > nf_ct_seq_offset+0x7a/0x9a
> > [ 23.468458] Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call
> >
>
> It should be that nf_ct_add_synproxy failed and the seqadj extentision is
> not added.
Note that nfct_synproxy_ext_add always returns NULL if
CONFIG_NETFILTER_SYNPROXY=n
The warning should also be removed.
> When nf_ct_add_synproxy fails, the init_conntrack fails too and return
> ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). In this case, the packet should be dropped directly, and
> should not be processed by the latter codes.
This means the commit breaks conntrack if SYNPROXY=n
Powered by blists - more mailing lists