[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160916190000.GA18116@uranus.lan>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:00:00 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
avagin@...nvz.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ip, diag -- Add diag interface for raw sockets
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:06:23AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:45:02PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> > >
> > > Try to be selective in the -K , do not kill tcp sockets ?
> >
> > I am running
> > ss -aKw 'dev == red'
> >
> > to kill raw sockets bound to device named 'red'.
>
> Thanks David, Eric! I'll play with this option today and report the results.
I created veth pair and bound raw socket into it.
[root@...7 iproute2]# misc/ss -A raw
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
ESTAB 0 0 127.0.0.1:ipproto-255 127.0.0.10:ipproto-9090
UNCONN 0 0 127.0.0.10:ipproto-255 *:*
UNCONN 0 0 :::ipv6-icmp :::*
UNCONN 0 0 :::ipv6-icmp :::*
ESTAB 0 0 ::1:ipproto-255 ::1:ipproto-9091
UNCONN 0 0 ::1%vm1:ipproto-255 :::*
[root@...7 iproute2]#
[root@...7 iproute2]# misc/ss -aKw 'dev == vm1'
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
UNCONN 0 0 ::1%vm1:ipproto-255 :::*
[root@...7 iproute2]# misc/ss -A raw
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
ESTAB 0 0 127.0.0.1:ipproto-255 127.0.0.10:ipproto-9090
UNCONN 0 0 127.0.0.10:ipproto-255 *:*
UNCONN 0 0 :::ipv6-icmp :::*
UNCONN 0 0 :::ipv6-icmp :::*
ESTAB 0 0 ::1:ipproto-255 ::1:ipproto-9091
so it get zapped out. Is there some other way to test it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists