[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWnQ6T3Om38HMQzvxb6QpDYv52ATnApxMn03htcA8AZTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:38:56 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net sched: stylistic cleanups
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_NEWQDISC, tc_modify_qdisc, NULL, NULL);
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_DELQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, NULL, NULL);
> - rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, tc_dump_qdisc, NULL);
> + rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, tc_dump_qdisc,
> + NULL);
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_NEWTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, NULL, NULL);
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_DELTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, NULL, NULL);
> - rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, tc_dump_tclass, NULL);
> + rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, tc_dump_tclass,
> + NULL);
Keeping them in the same line is more readable, IMHO.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists