netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: skbuff: Coding: Use eth_type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1474302055.22679.89.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:20:55 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: skbuff: Coding: Use eth_type_vlan() instead
 of open coding it

On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 18:53 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Fix 'skb_vlan_pop' to use eth_type_vlan instead of directly comparing
> skb->protocol to ETH_P_8021Q or ETH_P_8021AD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
> ---

You forgot to explicitly state this was targeting net-next tree.

This is detailed in Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.tx

Q: How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be
in?