netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 iproute2] ip route: check ftell, fseek return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160920095322.19a75d24@xeon-e3>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:53:22 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 iproute2] ip route: check ftell, fseek return value

On Thu,  8 Sep 2016 10:26:57 +0800
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:

> ftell() may return -1 in error case, which is not handled and therefore pass a
> negative offset to fseek(). The return code of fseek() is also not checked.
> 
> Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>

Applied