lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S36FVU7bNu3JudZuET-VdFND2ZO7n9A7k--qsZVyxTvcpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:49:51 -0700
From:   Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To:     Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] xdp: Infrastructure to generalize XDP

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> On 09/20/16 at 03:00pm, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> +static inline int __xdp_hook_run(struct list_head *list_head,
>> +                              struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>> +{
>> +     struct xdp_hook_ops *elem;
>> +     int ret = XDP_PASS;
>> +
>> +     list_for_each_entry(elem, list_head, list) {
>> +             ret = elem->hook(elem->priv, xdp);
>> +             if (ret != XDP_PASS)
>> +                     break;
>> +     }
>
> Walking over a linear list? Really? :-) I thought this was supposed
> to be fast, no compromises made.

Can you suggest an alternative?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ