[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474556053.23058.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:54:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...ellosystems.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress
actions
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 16:21 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
>
> Up until now, 'action mirred' supported only egress actions (either
> TCA_EGRESS_REDIR or TCA_EGRESS_MIRROR).
>
> This patch implements the corresponding ingress actions
> TCA_INGRESS_REDIR and TCA_INGRESS_MIRROR.
>
> This allows attaching filters whose target is to hand matching skbs into
> the rx processing of a specified device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
> ---
> Was wondering, whether netif_receive_skb or dev_forward_skb should be
> used for the rx bouncing. Used netif_receive_skb as in ifb device.
Hmm... we probably need to apply the full rcu protection before this
patch.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/667680/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists