lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474569728.23058.146.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:42:08 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress
 actions

On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 21:27 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:54:13 -0700 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hmm... we probably need to apply the full rcu protection before this
> > patch.
> > 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/667680/
> 
> Are you referring to order of application into net-next?
> 
> This patch seems to present no new tcf_mirred_params members nor
> need-to-be-protected code regions (please, correct me if wrong).
> So it does not _depend_ on the 'full rcu fixes', does it?

No, simply a reminder that we run lockless there, so you might need to
read some control variables once, and in a consistent way.

(Or a concurrent writer could change params in the middle of the
function)



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ