netdev - Re: [PATCH] ptp_clock: future-proofing drivers against PTP subsystem becoming optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160922.021856.219321683253472628.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 02:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     nicolas.pitre@...aro.org
Cc:     richardcochran@...il.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, josh@...htriplett.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp_clock: future-proofing drivers against PTP
 subsystem becoming optional

From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:25:58 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> Drivers must be ready to accept NULL from ptp_clock_register() if the
> PTP clock subsystem is configured out.
> 
> This patch documents that and ensures that all drivers cope well
> with a NULL return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Let's have the basics merged now and work out the actual Kconfig issue 
> separately. Richard, if you agree with this patch, I think this could go 
> via the netdev tree.

Applied to net-next, thanks.