[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160923234134.GA6397@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 19:41:34 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/vxlan: Avoid unaligned access in
vxlan_build_skb()
On (09/23/16 10:38), Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> So basically what I was thinking is we do something like reserving
> NET_IP_ALIGN and continue writing headers to skb->data, but we force
> the tracking for the inner headers into frag[0] so that we can keep
> the inner headers aligned without messing up the alignment for outer
> headers. In theory the inner offset and all that would still be
> functional but might need a few tweaks. You could probably even use
> the skb->encapsulation bit to indicate you are doing this. You could
> almost think of it as us doing something like the inverse of
> pskb_pull_tail. The general idea here is we want to actually leave
> the data in skb->data, but just reference it from frag[0] so that we
> don't accidentally pull in the 2 byte padding for alignment when
> transmitting the frame.
yes, I think something along this line could do the trick.. I tried
hacking it a bit today for vxlan, and it could be extended for all
these encaps protocols. Let me fix/test this more next week, maybe
we can discuss in Tokyo.
--Sowmini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists