[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474842129.2751.4.camel@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:22:09 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, xie.baoyou@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: mark symbols static where possible
On Sun, 2016-09-25 at 14:03 +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2128:5: warning: no
> previous prototype for 'ixgbe_led_on_t_x550em' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2150:5: warning: no
> previous prototype for 'ixgbe_led_off_t_x550em' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, these two functions are only used in the file in which they are
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> so this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This has been fixed and pushed upstream, why do you keep submitting this?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists