netdev - Re: ISDN-CAPI: Adjust 17 function calls together with variable assignments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:28:58 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: ISDN-CAPI: Adjust 17 function calls together with variable
 assignments

>> The script "checkpatch.pl" can point out that assignments should usually
>> not be performed within condition checks.
>> Thus move the assignment for a variable to a separate statement
>> in four functions.
> 
> Did you recycle this commit explanation?

Yes. - I am going to use similar commit messages for further changes
in other software modules.


> Because git diff tells me you actually touched about eight functions.

You are right. - I'm sorry that I overlooked to update this number somehow.


>     scripts/checkpatch.pl -f drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c | grep "assignment in if condition" | wc -l 
> 
> It tells me there are actually 18 instances of this "ERROR".
> Why did you ignore one of it in this patch?

Did I accidentally leave another update candidate over?

* How do you think about to pick such a software update opportunity up?

* Do you expect a resend for the steps 3 - 5 of this small patch series?

Regards,
Markus