lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2MHqFMmJyf89pWzopcr07ziVcHqUB+oNWdphKx95nGDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:34:17 +0900
From:   Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
To:     Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc:     Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ipv6 addrconf: rtr_solicits == -1 means unlimited

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Maciej Żenczykowski
<zenczykowski@...il.com> wrote:
> +                 ifp->idev->cnf.rtr_solicits != 0 &&

Given that some of this patch checks for == -1, and some of it checks
for != 0... is it possible that setting the value to something
unexpected like -3 will cause any issues to the stack? (Other than
just rendering IPv6 unusable on this interface, which seems like a
given.)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ