[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57E94495.3050306@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:53:57 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
CC: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress
actions
On 09/26/2016 05:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
[...]
> I would just care that we sometimes reschedule and don't do everything
> in one stack so we don't corrupt the machine and an admin has still a
> chance to solve the problem.
Sounds reasonable to me, and which is what dev_forward_skb() is doing
implicitly as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists