[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d325c0ab-9f1b-e00d-6b4c-30f39d939ab4@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:45:09 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"gigaset307x-common@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<gigaset307x-common@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ISDN-Gigaset: Enclose two expressions for the sizeof
operator by parentheses
>>> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void gigaset_dbg_buffer(enum debuglevel level, const unsigned char *msg,
>>> {
>>> unsigned char outbuf[80];
>>> unsigned char c;
>>> - size_t space = sizeof outbuf - 1;
>>> + size_t space = sizeof(outbuf - 1);
>
>> wrong ...
>> think that is 7 instead of 79.
>
>
> Well, it's sizeof(pointer) so either 4 or 8, but still,
> what Markus proposes here is _wrong_.
You are right at this place.
> Markus, do you know the script probably has a lower
> style conversion defect introduction rate than you do
> when doing these mechanical things.
Would it be nice if the script "checkpatch.pl" could avoid to point
such a false positive out anyhow?
> Please use it to verify what you are doing before
> submitting more defective patches.
Do you expect a resend for this update step so that an other statement
in the function "gigaset_initdriver" would eventually be adjusted?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists