[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474881174.1846.8.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:12:54 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ISDN-CAPI: Adjust 17 function calls together with
variable assignments
On Sun, 2016-09-25 at 13:13 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> The script "checkpatch.pl" can point out that assignments should usually
> not be performed within condition checks.
> Thus move the assignment for a variable to a separate statement
> in four functions.
Did you recycle this commit explanation? Because git diff tells me you
actually touched about eight functions.
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
So I ran checkpatch on this file, just like you did. Specifically, I
did:
scripts/checkpatch.pl -f drivers/isdn/capi/capidrv.c | grep "assignment in if condition" | wc -l
It tells me there are actually 18 instances of this "ERROR". Why did
you ignore one of it in this patch?
Paul Bolle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists