netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress actions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160927110711.12555f4e@pixies>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:07:11 +0300
From:   Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...ellosystems.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, shmulik.ladkani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress
 actions

Hi David,

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:56:06 -0400 (EDT), davem@...emloft.net wrote:
> The discussion on this patch has ventured off into what to do about
> recursion.
> 
> But it unclear to me where this specific patch, and this series,
> stands right now.  Someone please clear this up for me.

Status:
 - Series adds "ingress redirect/mirror" support
 - Positive feedback for the feature
 - So far no comments regarding code itself
 - Questions raised regarding "recursion handling"
   Expressed that existing mirred code (i.e egress redirect) is *already*
   loop-unsafe (and also, some non-tc netdev constructs, as exampled by
   others).
   Discussion then wandered to "recursion handling".

Regards,
Shmulik