[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad12e1a0-f5d5-176a-7d37-be2f3cb0af5d@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:34:01 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: gigaset307x-common@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: ISDN-Gigaset: Release memory in gigaset_initcs() after an
allocation failure
>> Will it matter here if the function "kfree" will be called for the
>> data structure members "bcs" and "inbuf" after a later function call
>> failed within the implementation of "gigaset_initcs"?
>
> My translation of this question is: could you please hold my hand while
> I read the code of a driver I do not use - a driver for hardware that I
> don't even have, and therefor cannot really test - after I submitted a
> patch that appears to be broken?
I got the impression that the exception handling was incomplete in the
implementation of the function "gigaset_initcs".
Does anybody (besides me) care for improving the software situation there?
> My answer to that question is: no, sorry, I won't do that.
I find that the process has just started once more to clarify in which
directions this software module could evolve.
Do we discuss a potential memory leak under special conditions here?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists