netdev - Re: next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201609300044.05324.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:44:05 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org
Cc:     Vishwanath Pai <vpai@...mai.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Joshua Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: Re: next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929)

On Thursday 29 September 2016, Vishwanath Pai wrote:
> I have sent a patch for this a couple of days ago to netdev, it hasn't
> made it to net-next yet. Here's the latest one:
> 
> [PATCH net-next v3] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Fix link error in 32bit
> arch because of 64bit division
> 
> This should fix the link error.

I also did a patch (not submitted yet), but my solution used 32-bit
math for the version 1 case. I think that would be better so we
don't slow down 32-bit architectures too much (div_u64_u64
is very slow).

	Arnd