netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM) Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160930.024026.274720546666401005.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:40:26 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     amir.jer.levy@...el.com, andreas.noever@...il.com,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, mario_limonciello@...l.com,
        thunderbolt-linux@...el.com, mika.westerberg@...el.com,
        tomas.winkler@...el.com, xiong.y.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM)
 Networking

From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:30:05 +0200

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:55:55AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Amir Levy <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:44:22 +0300
>> 
>> > This driver enables Thunderbolt Networking on non-Apple platforms
>> > running Linux.
>> 
>> Greg, any idea where this should get merged once fully vetted?  I can
>> take it through the net-next tree, but I'm fine with another more
>> appropriate tree taking it as well.
> 
> I am supposed to be taking thunderbolt patches, but if this really is a
> network driver, it should go under drivers/net/ somewhere.  It needs
> more review though, it's not ready to go through anyone's tree just yet :)
> 
> I'll let the thunderbolt maintainer go through it first before asking
> for a netdev review.

Ok, thanks Greg.