[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fdb5e81-0e95-0242-02bc-c2a8e15a9bf7@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:18:24 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@...iatek.com>, john@...ozen.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Cc: nbd@...nwrt.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, nelsonch.tw@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro
capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
Hello.
On 10/05/2016 03:12 PM, Nelson Chang wrote:
> Because hw lro started to be supported from MT7623, the proper way to check if
> the feature is capable is to judge by the chip id instead of by the dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index 0c67ab1..07f3ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -2348,6 +2348,14 @@ static int mtk_get_chip_id(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 *chip_id)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth)
> +{
> + if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> index a5b422b..58738fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@
> /* ethernet subsystem chip id register */
> #define ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3 0x0
> #define ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7 0x4
> +#define MT7623_ETH (7623)
() not needed at all.
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists