lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9ac7a0b-5ebb-d545-5308-f4f0ad79559b@akamai.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:48:21 -0400
From:   Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
        <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bnx2x: page allocation failure



On 10/03/2016 08:19 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Baron, Jason" <jbaron@...mai.com>
> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:24:32 +0000
>
>> Or should I just send the incremental at this point?
> Incremental is required at this point.

Hi David,

Ok. The above question was sent out erroneously. I have already posted
the incremental patch that I was referring to here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/675227/

Prior to that incremental patch post, I had composed the above question,
but realized that the right thing to do was simply to send the
incremental. However, I forgot to delete the 'draft' mail that I had,
and it accidentally got sent out on Monday.

Please ignore the noise, we are all set here :)

Thanks,

-Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ