lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 06 Oct 2016 11:04:03 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 01/13] rxrpc: Accesses of rxrpc_local::service need to
 be RCU managed

struct rxrpc_local->service is marked __rcu - this means that accesses of
it need to be managed using RCU wrappers.  There are two such places in
rxrpc_release_sock() where the value is checked and cleared.  Fix this by
using the appropriate wrappers.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
index 44c9c2b0b190..2d59c9be40e1 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -678,9 +678,9 @@ static int rxrpc_release_sock(struct sock *sk)
 	sk->sk_state = RXRPC_CLOSE;
 	spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
 
-	if (rx->local && rx->local->service == rx) {
+	if (rx->local && rcu_access_pointer(rx->local->service) == rx) {
 		write_lock(&rx->local->services_lock);
-		rx->local->service = NULL;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(rx->local->service, NULL);
 		write_unlock(&rx->local->services_lock);
 	}
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ