[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN1PR07MB2447ED02140770F0B46967D589D90@SN1PR07MB2447.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 12:25:09 +0000
From: "Chopra, Manish" <Manish.Chopra@...ium.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"maorg@...lanox.com" <maorg@...lanox.com>,
"tom@...bertland.com" <tom@...bertland.com>
Subject: RE: Accelerated receive flow steering (aRFS) for UDP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 5:08 AM
> To: Chopra, Manish <Manish.Chopra@...ium.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; maorg@...lanox.com; tom@...bertland.com
> Subject: Re: Accelerated receive flow steering (aRFS) for UDP
>
> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 22:55 +0000, Chopra, Manish wrote:
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > I am experimenting aRFS with our NIC devices, and for that I have
> > kernel 4.8.x installed with below config.
> >
> > CONFIG_RPS=y
> > CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL=y
> >
> > # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep processor
> > processor : 0
> > processor : 1
> > processor : 2
> > processor : 3
> > processor : 4
> > processor : 5
> > processor : 6
> > processor : 7
> > processor : 8
> > processor : 9
> > processor : 10
> > processor : 11
> > processor : 12
> > processor : 13
> > processor : 14
> > processor : 15
> >
> > I configured rps_sock_flow_entries and our NIC rx queues with below
> > values
> >
> > echo 32768 > /proc/sys/net/core/rps_sock_flow_entries
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-0/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-1/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-2/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-3/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-4/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-5/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-6/rps_flow_cnt
> > echo 4096 > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-7/rps_flow_cnt
> >
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-1/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-2/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-3/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-4/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-5/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-6/rps_cpus
> > echo ffff > /sys/class/net/p4p1/queues/rx-7/rps_cpus
> >
> > Below is IRQ affinity configuration for NIC irqs used.
> >
> > # cat /proc/irq/67/smp_affinity_list
> > 8
> > # cat /proc/irq/68/smp_affinity_list
> > 9
> > # cat /proc/irq/69/smp_affinity_list
> > 10
> > # cat /proc/irq/70/smp_affinity_list
> > 11
> > # cat /proc/irq/71/smp_affinity_list
> > 12
> > # cat /proc/irq/72/smp_affinity_list
> > 13
> > # cat /proc/irq/73/smp_affinity_list
> > 14
> > # cat /proc/irq/74/smp_affinity_list
> > 15
> >
> > Driver has required feature NETIF_F_NTUPLE set, ndo_rx_flow_steer()
> > registered and I am running UDP multiple connections stream using
> > netperf to the host where I am experimenting aRFS.
> >
> > # netperf -V
> > Netperf version 2.7.0
> >
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 8,8 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,48512 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 9,9 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,37990 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 10,10 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,40302 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 11,11 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,39071 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 12,12 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,58994 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 13,13 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,59884 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 14,14 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,40282 &
> > netperf -H 192.168.200.40 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 15,15 -- -m 1470 -P
> > 5001,56042 &
> >
> > I see that our registered callback for ndo_rx_flow_steer() "NEVER"
> > gets invoked for UDP packets, with TCP_STREAM I do see it gets
> > invoked.
> > But while running UDP_STREAM I see it gets invoked for some of TCP
> > packets as netperf also uses TCP managed connections while running
> > UDP_STREAM.
> >
> > My initial investigation suspects that while running UDP_STREAM with
> > netperf, rps_sock_flow_table doesn't get updated, as packets never
> > reach to the flow of inet_recvmsg()
> > where it gets updated using sock_rps_record_flow(). Which might be the
> > reason it never invokes NIC's flow steering handler ?
> >
> > Please note that when I run UDP stream using "iperf" - I do see that
> > our registered callback function for flow steering gets invoked for
> > "UDP" packets.
> > I am not sure if I am missing something in configuration or something
> > else which is I am unware of ?
> >
> > I appreciate any help for this.
>
> Make sure you use connected UDP flows
>
>
> netperf -t UDP_STREAM ... -- -N -n
>
> Otherwise, one UDP socket can be involved in millions of 4-tuples (aka
> flows)
>
>
Hi Eric, I tried with it but it doesn't help with the said issue. I still don't see that our registered handler for flow steering (ndo_rx_flow_steer()) is getting
invoked for UDP packets [ip->protocol = IPPROTO_UDP] .All it gets invoked for TCP packets only [ip->protocol = IPPROTO_TCP]
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 8,8 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,48512 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 9,9 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,37990 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 10,10 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,40302 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 11,11 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,39071 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 12,12 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,58994 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 13,13 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,59884 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 14,14 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,40282 &
netperf -H $1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 150 -T 15,15 -- -N -m 1470 -P 5001,56042 &
Thanks !!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists