[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAML_gOedjw6uJqp13YkGfXoLQTd_ikOC8OoUA4oXv15RYsgoUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:27:19 +0800
From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Laura Garcia Liebana <nevola@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, coreteam@...filter.org,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] netfilter: nf_tables: underflow in nft_parse_u32_check()
2016-10-12 14:08 GMT+08:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>:
> We don't want to allow negatives here.
>
> Fixes: 36b701fae12a ('netfilter: nf_tables: validate maximum value of u32 netlink attributes')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index b70d3ea..dd55187 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -4423,7 +4423,7 @@ static int nf_tables_check_loops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> */
I think it's better if you can convert it to follows:
> unsigned int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int max, u32 *dest)
int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, u32 max, u32 *dest)
> {
> - int val;
> + uint val;
u32 val;
>
> val = ntohl(nla_get_be32(attr));
> if (val > max)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists