netdev - Re: [mac80211] BUG_ON with current -git (4.8.0-11417-g24532f7)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1476366354.4904.31.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:45:54 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [mac80211] BUG_ON with current -git (4.8.0-11417-g24532f7)

On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 22:42 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commi
> > > t/?h=x86/vmap_stack&id=0a39cfa6fbb5d5635c85253cc7d6b44b54822afd
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commi
> > > t/?h=x86/vmap_stack&id=bf8cfa200b5a01383ea39fc8ce2f32909767baa8
> > 
> > That truly sounds like something we'd rather avoid in the TX/RX
> > paths though, which should perform well.
> 
> didn't fix.

It couldn't, since the new helpers weren't used in mac80211 in those
patches yet.

> so I finally had some time to do a better bug-reporter job.
> 
> I added a bunch of printk-s and several virt_addr_valid()-s
> to ieee80211_aes_ccm_encrypt().
> 
> and right befoe the Oops I see the following report from
> virt_addr_valid()
> 
> 
>  FAIL: 00004100002cba02 > ffffc900802cba02 || 1 -> (00004100002cba02
> >> 39) == 130

Yeah, we already know that in this function the aad variable is on the
stack, it explicitly is.

The question, though, is why precisely that fails in the crypto code.
Can you send the Oops report itself?

johannes